Showing posts with label Ottawa Senators. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ottawa Senators. Show all posts

15 August 2007

Your 2007-2008 Ottawa Senators

(To be published in the upcoming SportsGrumblings.com free preseason fantasy guide. My assignment was the Northeast division...)
================================

Ottawa Senators

2006-07 record: 48-25-9, 105 points. Second in division/fourth in conference. Lost in Stanley Cup Finals to Anaheim Ducks.

Coach: John Paddock
General Manager: Bryan Murray
Home arena: Scotiabank Place
Capacity: 19153

The often-underachieving Senators finally broke out of their playoff funk last season and became Eastern Conference champions, reaching the Stanley Cup finals for the first time in their modern existence. For a change they played the underdog role all year; three months into the season it looked as if the Senators would be in a dogfight all season to simply make the playoffs. However, a powerful second-half put the rest of the division on notice that the Senators were every bit the powerhouse they had imagined themselves over the better part of the last decade, and hit their stride in the playoffs – steamrolling the Pittsburgh Penguins, New Jersey Devils, and Buffalo Sabres in five games each before falling to the Anaheim Ducks in the finals. Yet the disappointment of flaming out in the final round shouldn’t be the final epitaph for Ottawa in 2007 – with the vast majority of the team’s talented core returning, the capital region has high hopes that perhaps this season will be the one where they bring home the title.

Last season’s changes (losing Zdeno Chara, Dominik Hasek, and Martin Havlat) looked to be backbreaking but clearly after an adjustment period the team rolled, playing five months of stellar hockey. The Senators didn’t suffer as many big changes during this off-season; forwards Mike Comrie and Peter Schaefer as well as defenceman Tom Preissing being the only standouts who will not return to the conference champions. As it stands, the Senators are poised to defend their crown and take it one step further this season.



Forwards:

Depth Chart:

Dany Heatley Jason Spezza Daniel Alfredsson
Chris Kelly Mike Fisher Patrick Eaves
Shean Donovan (RW) Dean McAmmond Chris Neil

Antoine Vermette Brian McGrattan


rookies/callups: C-Josh Hennessy, LW-Jim McKenzie.

Once again this season, Ottawa shouldn’t have to worry about offence. Their output (averaging 3.5 goals per game last year, second in the league) should remain constant, as their core talent remains young and even perhaps improving. No team boasts an elite three combination like Dany Heatley, Jason Spezza, and Daniel Alfredsson. While they were split up on occasion last year to try to spread the offence around, it was clear that together they formed a devastating combo, one that perhaps only lacks a quality nickname to earn historical distinction. Each of the three finished comfortably within the top 20 in league scoring, with Heatley being only one of two (Vincent Lecavalier) to notch at least 50 goals.

While the dropoff in talent after the big three is obviously great, the Senators do boast offensive threats after the first line. Mike Fisher has become one of the better two-way centers in the league; known for his speed and tight checking, Fisher’s second straight 22-goal campaign places him as a solid threat in every zone. Youngsters Patrick Eaves and Chris Kelly each made strides last year, contributing 29 goals between them – with the departure of late-season acquisition Mike Comrie (New York Islanders), look for Eaves and Kelly to increase their ice-time and be relied upon for solid depth scoring. Antoine Vermette is another young speedster on the rise – his 14 even-strength goals last season were fourth-best on the team. With more power-play time this year, Vermette could and should crack the 50 point barrier. Chris Neil is known more for his mouth and fists, but the truth is that Neil is a talented player when he controls himself; as the main policeman on the team (perhaps slowly ceding that role to Brian McGrattan) he can be good for roughly 15 goals while opponents look over their shoulders and watch their chins.

Defence:

Depth Chart:

Chris Phillips Wade Redden
Joe Corvo Anton Volchenkov
Christoph Schubert Andrej Meszaros
Lawrence Nycholat


For an elite team, Ottawa’s defencive corps are underrated as a whole. Their top two defenders - Wade Redden and Chris Phillips - are well-known (being drafted 2nd and 1st overall in 1995 and 1996 respectively), but their supporting cast stepped out of the ominous shadow of the departed Zdeno Chara last season and helped the team keep to a tidy 2.6 goals allowed per game, outstanding for such an offensive powerhouse. While no individual was a big scorer (the departed Tom Preissing (Florida Panthers) led the defence with 38 points), the contributions were spread out on the scoresheet, with each of the top six getting at least 25 points. Four defensemen sported a +/- of +30 or more (Preissing +40, Anton Volchenkov +37, Phillips +36, Christoph Shubert +30), which if anything shows more of a team-wide commitment to quality defence. The playoffs were where the group really shined, especially in the conference finals against Buffalo, keeping the Sabres horribly frustrated on the power play throughout the five games.


Goaltending:

Ray Emery
Martin Gerber

One year ago Ray Emery was the easy scapegoat for Ottawa’s shocking flameout in the second round at the hands of the Buffalo Sabres. While he was hardly the only Senator to play poorly, the sight of him on the ice as Jason Pominville scored the series winner was seared into the minds of Senators’ fans all summer. So when Ottawa signed Martin Gerber to challenge Emery for the top position last season, most figured the job was Gerber’s to lose. Which is exactly what he did – after a poor start to the season, injuries shelved him and Ray Emery came in and absolutely took over, leading the Senators the rest of the way and leaving no doubt as to who the new number one goalie was, and is. Emery was just signed to a three-year deal and will remain their netminder for the foreseeable future. Yet for all the progress Emery has made, his flaws are apparent: he relies too much on his athletic ability to make saves, as his positioning is well below-average for an NHL goaltender. He also has a maddening tendency to leave glaring rebounds, and as a result – even though the team is now “set” in goal – and perhaps due to the overall strength of the club - Emery remains the team’s one question mark.

Outlook:

While the on-ice changes have been minimal this off-season, the firing of General Manager John Muckler was seen as a bit of a surprise. Coach Bryan Murray was bumped up to the GM spot and John Paddock takes over the reigns, hoping to lead the club to three more postseason victories. Can they do it? It’s easy to make the case for the Senators being a top team once again – they will feel the pressure from a young(er) Buffalo club, but the relative weakness of the rest of the division and the likely adjustment period for the Sabres should mean Ottawa will once again reign supreme in the Northeast division. This might be their last opportunity with this core of players, as a number of their big names are in line for free agency next summer, most notably Wade Redden and Dany Heatley, who will likely break the bank with whichever team he signs with. Undoubtedly there will be a sense of urgency to win it all this year, and as this year’s team bears a strong similarity to last year’s, look for Ottawa to once again be in the mix for the elusive Stanley Cup.

02 August 2007

2007-08 NE Depth Charts: Ottawa Senators

Preparing some Northeast division previews - I'll be posting my best stab at the depth charts as they exist today (late July).

Ottawa hasn't lost much, especially compared to last year's offseason (Zdeno Chara, Martin Havlat, Dominik Hasek). Peter Schaefer is a quality forward who will be missed; Mike Comrie was only added late in the year. Tom Preissing shouldn't be missed much as this team has quality defensive depth. Especially with another year in the books for youngsters like Patrick Eaves, Chris Kelly, and Antoine Vermette, the Sens should be right back near the top of the East again this year:

Depth Chart:




Dany Heatley Jason Spezza Daniel Alfredsson
Dean McAmmond
Mike Fisher Patrick Eaves
Oleg Saprykin -UFA Chris Kelly
Chris Neil
Shean Donovan (RW) Antoine Vermette Brian McGrattan



possible rookies: Josh Hennessy – C, Jim McKenzie – LW

Defence:


Chris Phillips Wade Redden
Joe Corvo Anton Volchenkov
Christoph Schubert Andrej Meszaros
Lawrence Nycholat

Goaltending:


Ray Emery Martin Gerber

Despite his quality season last year, the weak(est) link on this team remains in goal with Ray Emery. He could still emerge as a top-flight goaltender, but he needs serious progress on rebounds and positioning.

07 June 2007

Anaheim Ducks - your Stanley Cup Champions

Really has a ring to it, eh?

various observations/notes:

The Ducks should've worn this abomination last night:



Gary Bettman - as always - couldn't resist a snarky opportunity to stick a little needle to his critics when on the red carpet (I realize I'm old-fashioned when I pine for the days where there were no on-ice wireless mics and announcements, but I always prefer to have an event or moment sell itself. Welcome to the 21st century, I suppose...) he rhetorically, arrogantly, and self-servingly stated to the crowd "well, I guess hockey is doing pretty well in California!" knowing that his ever-growing legion of critics has been on him harder than ever regarding ill-advised markets, etc. Bettman loves to be able to point out the last three Cup champions: Tampa Bay, Carolina, Anaheim.


Hard not to love the play of Scott Niedermayer, a Hall-of-Fame mortal lock. But I thought the Conn Smythe could - and should - have gone to Andy MacDonald, who I'm guessing a lot of fans had very little idea about before this series. He's a game-breaker and was a constant threat during the entire series.


Steve Smith now has historical company in one Chris Phillips:




Overall, Ottawa played a rather pitiful series. Sure they had their moments where they looked like the team that steamrolled through the second half of the season and through the first three rounds of the playoffs - much of last night's second period for instance. But there were many who simply failed to compete - none more in my book than Jason Spezza. Spezza never showed any creativity with the puck and repeatedly failed on the defensive end of his game. Aside from countless turnovers his listless and frankly contact-avoidance style of play left his teammates (mostly Daniel Alfredsson, one of the few Sens forwards who brought game) in the lurch. Spezza registered just one shot over the final three games and overall in the five-game series registered just two points - both second assists.

Although he was not the reason they lost, Ray Emery looked shaky throughout. Despite a few highlight-reel saves, his positioning is just awful and he has no idea how to control a rebound. From my observing him, he also seems to lose sight of the puck much more often than other goalies. I became a believer in Emery this year after his playoff flame-out last season. However, after this performance, Emery will have to improve if the Sens hope to repeat next season as Eastern Conference champions.


At any rate, congratulations to the Ducks. In no way were they a fluke champion, they either held the West lead or were within a few points of it all season, and crushed the high-scoring Senators team in five. With the young core of talent in Anaheim, they have a great chance at either repeating or getting back to the finals within the next few years.

And if Teemu Selanne decides to go out Lanny McDonald style and retire, what a great ride it has been.
From his never-to-be-duplicated 76-goal rookie season in Winnipeg to his post-lockout resurgence in Anaheim (88 goals in the past two seasons) over the past 14 years fans have been treated to one of the all-time greats. Congratulations to one of the nicest and classiest athletes to ever play in North America.





The NHL draft begins two weeks from tomorrow night.

21 May 2007

congrats to Ottawa

I didn't have time (ok, or the will) to post this weekend. A tight series of weird games marked by peaks of end-to-end action separated by long stretches of inconsistent hockey. By both teams.

For a cheap and easy review...Ottawa's best outplayed Buffalo's best, and Ray Emery was rarely tested. Depending on your point-of-view, that could either be offensive ineptitude on Buffalo's part or a fantastic defensive scheme on Ottawa's part. I'm tending to steer more towards Ottawa's play with a side-dash of Buffalo playing tight.

It is easy to point out that Ottawa's best players were better than Buffalo's best players. The Sens' Pizza Line ("they deliver") of Daniel Alfredsson, Jason Spezza, and Dany Heatley were markedly more effective than Daniel Briere, Chris Drury, and Thomas Vanek, not to mention Jason Pominville (despite meager offensive contributions, he did perform solid work in his own zone defensively) and Maxim Afinogenov.

As for flaws in Buffalo's game, the power-play is the obvious first answer as well as the correct one. Enough has been written about just how putrid it was, and not much effort would need to be made to argue that even an average man advantage unit in this series could have reversed the outcome. Although this was primarily Buffalo's problem, as their power-play was sub-par all season long, credit must be given to Ottawa who refused to deviate from their game plan. The Senators were content to let the Sabres (attempt to) set up at the blueline - Buffalo repeatedly tried to make the perfect play yet didn't ever move the puck often or creatively enough to get anything in the way of quality chances.


I'm finding myself a bit spent in terms of hockey and especially analysis. I think I'll be taking this week to relax and actually watch what's left of the Western finals before sitting down to further analyze the Eastern Finals. I'll have a post or two before my inevitable Cup Finals preview here (and at SportsGrumblings.com).

11 May 2007

Game 1 thoughts - BUF/OTT

Kind of a strange game last night. The Versus crew kept saying "what a game we have" and yes, it was tight for the first ~57 minutes. But it was not a smooth game, not very well played. From the Buffalo Sabres' point of view, I've never quite seen a frustrating pattern like that - they began to generate offence early with an excellent forecheck, good cycling... their 5-on-5 play was quite dominant at times. Outside of the Heatley-Spezza-Alfie line, Ottawa couldn't generate much of anything.

The Sabres quality work led to them drawing penalties....which cost them the game. Each Buffalo power play sucked all the life out of the team. The Sabres' powerplay actually generated far more chances for Ottawa, leading with the shorthanded goal by Mike Fisher. There could have been more.

Each PP was truly a momentum-killer for Buffalo - how can that be? 5-on-5 for the first ~30-40 minutes the Sabres were in control.

Neither team really brought their best - Ottawa was still relatively weak after their first line (who were fantastic, btw. Dany Heatley owns the Sabres).

Two players who stood out with their poor play for Buffalo:

Thomas Vanek. Merely invisible for the first 2 periods, switched over to awful by the third with some brutal giveaways.

Dmitri Kalinin
. Kalinin has been a focal point for Buffalo fans' ire over the past few years - he's a player who when he is on can sometimes justify the faith that Lindy Ruff and Darcy Regier have put in him over the years. Last night was bit of the old "low-confidence" Dmitri. A bad pinch led to Fisher's goal...lazy coverage let Oleg Saprykin get free in the third for the game-winner on a deflection. Other times he just failed to make the right play on a breakout. He was flat-out terrible last night.

Chris Drury had a rough night, and I only bring him up because there has actually been some talk about him being a Conn Smythe candidate which I think is overstating his contributions to date. Obviously as a Buffalo fan I love Drury but he's the type of player that when he scores (and obviously his Friday night goal will become legendary in Western New York) he's the most clutch player in history. When he doesn't score he's "doing all the little things" (which means "we can't quite tell what he's doing out there but he never smiles so he must be working hard"). Last night he didn't really do either - Daniel Briere rightly gets called out when he's not producing (and he should be again for last night's rather dispirited performance), and Drury needs to be held to the same standard.

Overall there were a shocking number of lazy or stupid giveaways last night, and from everyone. The official scoresheet has Buffalo with 19 giveaways - it certainly seemed like more.

In the end - it was one game, and one in which both teams could find many faults. Had the Sabres played better (and had an average power play) they would have won. Had the Senators been able to bring more offence and play well 5-on-5, the game would have been over after two.

Game 2: Saturday night at 8pm EDT.

09 May 2007

Eastern Conference finals preview: Buffalo Sabres (1) vs. Ottawa Senators (4)

2007 EASTERN CONFERENCE FINAL

#1 Buffalo vs. #4 Ottawa
Thursday, May 10, 7:00 p.m. at Buffalo
Saturday, May 12, 8:00 p.m. at Buffalo
Monday, May 14, 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa
Wednesday, May 16, 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa
* Saturday, May 19, 2:00 p.m. at Buffalo
* Monday, May 21, 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa
* Wednesday, May 23, 7:00 p.m. at Buffalo


Series overview:

If the NHL powers-that-be wanted to cherry-pick two teams to feature the skill and excitement of the post-lockout era, they couldn't have done better than this – the 113 point Buffalo Sabres against the 105 point Ottawa Senators is the marquee match-up that neutral hockey fans have wanted to see all year; featuring the two best teams in the Eastern Conference facing off for the right to play for the Stanley Cup. There's a lot of intrigue and anticipation in advance of this meeting - will the two highest scoring teams in the league deliver an offensive explosion? Will the bad-blood from this season spill over into the playoffs and result in more free-for-alls like we saw from these two back in February? Can Ottawa exercise their playoff demons and finally become conference champions after years of unfulfilled expectations? Will Buffalo be able to turn up their game to the high standards they set for themselves in the regular season? Can either team legitimately be determined a favourite in this series?

Why Buffalo should win the series:

Going by nearly every number possible, Buffalo - until proven otherwise - is still the best team in hockey. There's no need to review all the stats again - simply, this team can score in bunches and from every line, an attack Ottawa has yet to come close to facing with the very top-heavy offenses featured by the Pittsburgh Penguins and New Jersey Devils. And while the Sabres didn't exactly fill the net during their first two rounds, the last two games against the New York Rangers were possibly the best they played thus far, leading to the impression that they're finding their "playoff legs" so to speak. The primary reason Buffalo found their game was due to their return to aggressive puck pursuit - they have to be willing to take risks and force the opposing defence to take hits in their own zone to clear the puck. By dictating the style of play to their advantage they not only create numerous quality scoring chances, they in turn prevent any play in their own zone, keeping their defence fresh.

Perhaps most encouraging to the team, and their fans, is that they have no injuries to speak of (in stark contrast to last season). What injuries they may eventually face they now can counter with unprecedented and unmatched depth, most notably standout rookie Drew Stafford who, with the return of spirited forward Paul Gaustad, finds himself in the press box strictly due to the numbers game. If Buffalo needs to turn to Stafford in this series, it can hardly be deemed a drop-off.

With all the talk about how explosive Buffalo's offence is, they actually do have one aspect of the team that is underrated. After last Friday's miracle finish in Buffalo (where Chris Drury scored with seven seconds left to tie the game at one, and Maxim Afinogenov won it in overtime) Ryan Miller was legitimately upset in the postgame interviews, saying he "let the team down" by letting in the late goal by Martin Straka. Just to review, it was the only goal he let in all game and it was a wicked wrist shot screened by his defenceman Brian Campbell.

Miller has arrived as a fearsome playoff goaltender who cannot be judged on statistics alone - his penchant for foiling breakaways may be unparalleled in the NHL and despite the eventual emergence of the Buffalo offence he was the primary reason the Sabres advanced past the New York Rangers in round two.

Why Buffalo should be afraid:

There is some sense that the Buffalo Sabres have peaked and are cracking a bit under either the intense physical play of the postseason or some phantom weight of being the favourites. I'm not sure how much stock to put in rather ethereal characteristics but there are a number of concrete concerns for the Sabres. If there has been any knock on Buffalo this year, and Ottawa themselves made reference to it earlier in the season, it is that they can be intimidated and forced off the puck. Ottawa is not afraid to play on the edge and should be expected to do so in this series, even at the risk of playing shorthanded (which against Buffalo might not be much of a risk - read on). If Buffalo is forced into playing more conservatively - shying away from contact rather than initiating it - they have a tendency to not play their fast transition game and also become pinned in their own zone, where their offensive attack usually starts. As good as the Sabres defence is in terms of moving the puck through three zones to their forwards and defending on the rush, they have shown weaknesses when faced with a strong forecheck and cycling system, often to the point of either bad giveaways or falling into penalty trouble.

It seems almost inexplicable that a team as powerful as Buffalo's could be so bad on the powerplay. Yet they've gone well past the point of "small sample size" to the realization that they have a flawed approach on the man-advantage. Rather than using their speed and skill, they have become predictable in their approach to set up the point men for shots which has resulted in cashing in on just over 15% of their opportunities in the postseason. With a skilled and aggressive Ottawa defence, the Buffalo coaching staff simply must redefine their approach on the power play or they will lose this series.

Why Ottawa should win the series:

Although Anaheim has made relatively short work of their opponents thus-far this playoff season, Ottawa can make a strong case for being the premier team through the first two rounds. They dispatched the Penguins and Devils with ease, growing stronger as the games went on. They're leading all teams with 3.3 goals per game in the postseason. Most encouraging to Ottawa fans, their best players are finally playing like it: Daniel Alfredsson, Jason Spezza, and Dany Heatley (who has become somewhat of a Sabre-killer, echoes of Michel Goulet from a past generation) have gelled and are playing as well as they have all season, terrorizing opposing defences. Heatley in particular scored eight goals in as many games against the Sabres this season and the Sabres must find a way to prevent him from getting comfortable in the Buffalo zone.

After losing Zdeno Chara to Boston in the off-season, it was expected by many that the Ottawa defence would take a hit, but after initial growing pains their defensive unit has become – if not well-known – one of the best in the NHL. In particular they’ve been doing an excellent job clogging offensive lanes and blocking opposing shots. Anton Volchenkov led the league in blocked shots during the regular season and is at it again in the playoffs with 39 thus far, with teammate Chris Phillips not far behind with 34. With the Senators' defence stepping up while on the penalty kill, don't be surprised to see a number of quality shorthanded chances for Ottawa.

Ottawa's power play has been deadly at a 22.7% rate in the playoffs thus far. Combine that with the Sabres' difficulties in shutting down the Rangers' talented power play unit and that could spell doom for Buffalo, who is at less than 80% on the penalty kill through two rounds.

Why Ottawa should be afraid:

For all the talk about how well the top line is playing, they still have demonstrated a lack of consistent scoring threats from their other lines. Unless their secondary scorers like Antoine Vermette, Mike Comrie, and Mike Fisher can at the very least put sustained pressure on the Buffalo defence, let alone score, the Senators could find themselves behind in this series quickly. They will also need to better the Sabres at even-strength play, a difficult task.

Goaltender Ray Emery has proven many doubters wrong this season, taking the number one job and establishing himself as a quality netminder. However, he has yet to face consistent pressure all year as he is about to against Buffalo - he must come to grips with the fact that he let in some less-than-stellar goals in last year's loss to Buffalo. He's a far better - and more confident - goalie now but how will he react to giving up a bad goal this season? (…and on everyone’s minds: will Ryan Miller be a willing fight partner should the teams choose to go that route?)

While distant playoff history is not a quality guide to determine the outcome of this or any series, it must nevertheless be said that the Ottawa franchise will feel pressure at least until they make it to the finals. It becomes imperative for Ottawa to take at least one of the first two games in Buffalo lest they start questioning themselves en route to another failed postseason.

Random useless but fun playoff facts:

The Sabres have won each of the three playoff meetings between the two clubs, each being a memorable series in its own right. In 1997 the teams went to overtime of game seven before Derek Plante ripped a slapshot off of Ron Tugnutt's glove to win the series. 1999 saw the first-place Senators get swept and the shine first began to fade from Alexei Yashin (zero points after finishing the season tied for second in goals with 44). Last season's tight five-game series featured four one-goal games and ended on Jason Pominville's shorthanded tally in overtime. Buffalo head coach Lindy Ruff has established himself as one of the better playoff coaches in recent memory, taking the Sabres to four trips to the conference finals in his nine years at the helm – add one Stanley Cup victory to that resume and he will rightfully take his place among the better coaches of all-time.

My pick:

One understated key for Buffalo might be how well top defenseman Henrik Tallinder handles Ottawa's top line. Especially at home, Buffalo can match Tallinder (with partner Toni Lydman) with the deadly Ottawa line, and add pressure with playoff revelation Dainius Zubrus who overall has easily been Buffalo's best forward in the postseason, not shying away from quality dirty work along the boards in all zones.

Buffalo needs to avoid the penalty box (perhaps on both ends, due to their weak power play) as their five-on-five play in the playoffs is as impressive as it was in the regular season, outscoring their opponents at nearly a two-to-one margin through 11 games.

As for who will eventually win this best-of-seven – nobody can predict. The epitome of a toss-up series, the end result may very well turn on a random bounce of the puck or unforeseen circumstance that forces otherwise inexperienced players into action. As touched upon above, Ottawa will win this series if they can establish a constant pressure in the Buffalo zone, leaving Buffalo scrambling to create offense and ending up in the penalty box, where the Senators will pick apart Buffalo. Buffalo will win this series if they quickly and effectively neutralize the Senators' top line and can keep them frustrated - Ottawa won't quite have the quality depth to keep up with all four Buffalo lines if the Sabres can consistently roll them (read: quickly move the puck out of the Buffalo zone and stay out of penalty trouble).

I’ve gone back and forth between thinking each team was going to win this series - no result (other than it only going four or five games) could be seen as unexpected; I would think that if Ottawa can take three of the first five, they will clinch it at home in game six. However in the end, I can’t go with anything other than this series going seven games and if that happens, I give it to the home team.
Buffalo in seven.

07 May 2007

Eastern Conference finals: Buffalo vs. Ottawa

The East's two best teams will meet, starting probably this Thursday or Friday. This one promises to be mean and exciting.

I'll have a writeup/preview in the next day or so. In the meantime, here's an early Senators preview from Sportsnet (with hilights from last year's series between the two):

26 April 2007

Playoff preview: New Jersey Devils (2) vs. Ottawa Senators (5)

to be published at SportsBlurb.com

Schedule:

Thursday, April 26 7:00 p.m. Ottawa at New Jersey
Saturday, April 28
8:00 p.m. Ottawa at New Jersey VERSUS
Monday, April 30
7:00 p.m. New Jersey at Ottawa VERSUS
Wednesday, May
2 7:00 p.m. New Jersey at Ottawa VERSUS
*Saturday, May
5 8:00 p.m. Ottawa at New Jersey VERSUS
*Monday, May
7 7:00 p.m. New Jersey at Ottawa VERSUS
*Wednesday, May
9 7:00 p.m. Ottawa at New Jersey


Series overview:

Seen in simplistic terms, this looks to be a series between an offensive giant vs. a defensive one. These two teams finished one win and two points apart in the standings but their styles are very different – how will the always defensively-conscious New Jersey Devils stymie the dangerous offensive attack (288 goals, second in NHL) of the Ottawa Senators while scoring enough to win?

Why New Jersey should win the series:

Despite their meager goal-scoring totals for the season, New Jersey has more offensive talent than their overall statistics show. With six goals in as many games (and leading all playoff scorers), emerging star Zach Parise showed why he's a good bet to be a steady 30-40 goal scorer for years to come. Relative old hand Scott Gomez leads the league with nine points, and Brian Rafalski, Patrick Elias, and Brian Gionta all are in the top-10 in points. Their front-end talent forms a swarming threat to opposing defences. New Jersey's power play clicked at a 25% rate against Tampa Bay. There's always the Martin Brodeur factor, as he had one of the greatest seasons of his career, but he’ll have to improve on his play over the first round, as Ottawa sports a much deeper attack than he faced from the Lightning.

Why New Jersey should be afraid:

Brodeur did not have a consistent first-round series against Tampa Bay – yes, his overall numbers were good but games two and three were marked by shaky goals that kept the Lightning in the series much longer than New Jersey would have liked. Defensively this team will still have to answer questions – they consistently hold teams to low goal totals but they will need to play out of character and bring a much more physical style of play to neutralize the dangerous Ottawa offence. The Devils should be able to keep the odd-man rushes to a minimum but if the Senators can develop a cycle in the New Jersey zone, the Devils will not have the brawn to defend against it for long. Finally, despite the front-end talent of New Jersey, the fact remains that they (in)famously play a shutdown style of hockey; opportunistic to a fault. With the talent and discipline in place it makes for successful seasons but the big challenge will be if Ottawa takes early leads – will New Jersey have the skill and mindset to change their style of play, and open up the attack more than they’re comfortable with? And if so, beyond the few big guns they do have, who will provide scoring support? Their lack of scoring depth often doesn’t hurt them, but against a premier opponent like Ottawa it could prove fatal.

And finally this late info: Patrick Elias will miss at least game one because of what is being called a cold - obviously very bad news for New Jersey.

Why Ottawa should win the series:

The importance of Ottawa’s first round defeat of the Pittsburgh Penguins cannot be overstated. Through the past decade, the franchise has had great regular season success but has never matched expectations in the post-season; qualifying for the playoffs in each of the past ten seasons (including six 100+ point seasons) Ottawa had only won five of 14 playoff series and advanced to the conference finals once (losing to New Jersey in 2003). Combining that pressure and the public’s fascination with the sudden rise and stability of the Penguins, the Senators were in many ways an afterthought in the first round. After a convincing five game beating, the Senators served notice that they are still a premier team. Their top players are well-known: Dany Heatley, Jason Spezza, and Captain Daniel Alfredsson, but general hockey fans may not be aware of the depth in this team - players like Mike Fisher and Chris Kelly make this team a true threat. Among Ottawa skaters, only Kelly (three) and Mike Comrie (two) had more than one even-strength goal against Pittsburgh. Finally, goalie Ray Emery took a beating last year for spotty play in the post-season – his play was poor, but he was an undeserved scapegoat. This season he emerged as the clear number one and should give his team confidence that he will back up the team after any breakdowns in front of him.

Why Ottawa should be afraid:

Having just complimented their lesser-known lights, their stars need to step up and play better to advance - Heatley and Spezza in particular. Each played more than 63 minutes of even-strength play during the Pittsburgh series and their line never scored a goal. It should go without saying that that performance won't be good enough to win against the tighter and more disciplined Devils. Despite the increased swagger the Sens should possess, there will still be talk about underachieving until they someday get to the Cup finals - only the team itself can quell such doubtless-annoying talk in the media and amongst the fans by winning, so in some ways the pressure remains.

Random useless but fun playoff facts:

Ottawa and New Jersey have met twice in the post-season, each team taking one series. The first meeting in 1998 saw the Senators pull a shocking first-round upset of the Devils – 14 wins separated the two in the standings but Ottawa prevailed in six low-scoring games. The 2003 meeting was in the conference finals where the Devils returned the favour in knocking off the President’s Trophy-winning Senators in a 3-2 seventh game.

My pick:

New Jersey had what could be called a typical year for them – top of the division, lowest goals-against in the conference, just (barely) enough offense to win. Ottawa hid under the radar for most of this season - they got off to a slow start, had goaltending troubles, adjusted to major off-season losses (most notably Zdeno Chara, Martin Havlat), but had a fantastic second-half.

Due much to the nature of the modern NHL, the overall parity has already given us a few match-ups in the early rounds that would have been worthy as Conference Finals, and this series could be another one. Nevertheless it looks from here that the Senators are just that much stronger in every zone. The Devils had difficulty with the rather one-dimensional Lightning while the Senators disposed of the Penguins with much more ease than many would have thought possible. The Devils had great success this season but don’t have the look of a tough playoff team. Whereas the Senators could have been accused of playing cautiously in the past, the early-season emergence of Ray Emery in part helped the team play with a confidence that could prove deadly to their opponents through the playoffs. Ottawa’s road to the Cup is proving to be very challenging which in the end could play to their benefit - it’s likely they’ll have to get through four 100+ point teams to win it all. Taking the Elias absence into account, the Senators will get at least one step further as they should defeat New Jersey in 5.

11 April 2007

Playoff preview: Ottawa Senators (4) vs. Pittsburgh Penguins (5)

OTTAWA SENATORS (4) vs. PITTSBURGH PENGUINS (5)

Series D - #4 Ottawa vs. #5 Pittsburgh
Date Time (ET) Location Network
Wed., April 11 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa CBC, RDS, VERSUS
Sat., April 14 3:00 p.m. at Ottawa CBC, RDS, NBC
Sun., April 15 6:00 p.m. at Pittsburgh VERSUS, CBC, RDS
Tue., April 17 7:00 p.m. at Pittsburgh VERSUS, CBC, RDS
*Thu., April 19 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa CBC, RDS, VERSUS
*Sun., April 22 1:00 p.m. at Pittsburgh NBC, CBC, RDS
*Tue., April 24 7:00 p.m. at Ottawa VERSUS, CBC, RDS

If there was a series that was made to introduce sports fans to playoff hockey, this would be the one. The Senators and Penguins are the second and third highest scoring teams in the league and have enough marquee names to interest any casual fan, including the league's leading scorer (and top marketing tool) Sidney Crosby.


Why Ottawa
should win the series: Ottawa could be the sleeping giant in these playoffs - they're loaded up front with the usual suspects in Dany Heatley (50 goals, 105 points), Jason Spezza (34 goals, 87 points in just 67 games), and Daniel Alfredsson (87 points). They have supplemental scoring in Mike Comrie, Antoine Vermette, Chris Kelly, and the criminally underrated Mike Fisher. Ray Emery - last year's playoff scapegoat - started the year as the number two netminder behind Martin Gerber but when Gerber faltered, Emery took the job and secured it, ending up seventh in save percentage (and first in penalty minutes) and providing the spark that turned the Senators' season around.

Why Ottawa
should be afraid: Even after all that success, they drew a very tough opening round assignment against Pittsburgh. Ottawa lost toughness on defence when they couldn't resign the towering Zdeno Chara and Pittsburgh has just the pack of buzzing forwards to exploit any defencive deficiencies. Ottawa may be strong but the sting of repeated playoff disappointments is still fresh, and will be until they manage to break through to the Cup finals. Even though this series looks to be evenly matched, the pressure is squarely on the veteran Ottawa club to win, as a first-round loss - however legitimate - could spell the breakup of this club.

Why Pittsburgh
should win the series: Young, fast, aggressive, exciting. They weren't supposed to come this far, this fast. 19 year old scoring champion Crosby (120 points), rookies Evgeni Malkin (33 goals, 85 points) and Jordan Staal (29 goals, seven shorthanded)...veterans Mark Recchi and Gary Roberts...Sergei Gonchar having a great bounce-back season on defence with 67 points...this is a team that plays up-tempo hockey for better or worse. When they are clicking, few teams can keep up with them. Ottawa stands a chance of being outskated in this series as Pittsburgh won three of four versus the Senators this season.

Why Pittsburgh
should be afraid: For the same reasons Ottawa should: this is the most compelling and difficult first-round series. Ottawa may have some mental hangups before and after the games, but on the ice few teams can match them for talent. If experience counts for anything, the Senators have been there time and time again as a group where only a handful of Penguins have experienced the postseason. Marc-Andre Fleury will be under great scrutiny as the former number one overall pick in 2003 will see every save and goal allowed analyzed like he's never known at the NHL level. He cannot be inconsistent if the Penguins are to win this.

Random useless but fun playoff facts: The Penguins have had a seismic existence - making the playoffs 21 times in their history (dating to 1967) and winning two Stanley Cups, but have also suffered through two separate financial disasters 30 years apart. They've also suffered through two of the more humiliating playoff defeats: in the second round of the 1975
playoffs they faced the New York Islanders and jumped out to a 3-0 lead, only to squander it to the upstart Isles and ultimately lose game seven 1-0 on home ice, becoming just the second pro sports team (1942 Detroit Red Wings vs. Toronto Maple Leafs) to lose a series after such a lead. In 1993 they were the two-time defending Cup champs and President's Trophy winners for the first time, setting a record along the way by winning 17 games in a row. After destroying New Jersey in round one (and setting another record by winning their 14th straight playoff game) they were shocked once again by the inferior Islanders in game seven, losing in dramatic fashion at home in overtime. The old Ottawa Senators won the first Stanley Cup after the NHL took control of it for good, in the spring of 1927. The modern Senators have had much regular season success over the past decade but have fallen short in the playoffs - winning their division four of the past eight seasons, and the President's Trophy in 2003, but have only advanced to the conference finals one time in that span, losing a heartbreaking seven game set to New Jersey that same year.


Our pick:
For once Ottawa was lying in the weeds all year, in the shadow of teams like Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and New Jersey. At Christmas, the Senators were a .500 team but only lost seven games in regulation afterwards, making them as good as any team in the league....such as the Penguins, who also were .500 on December 27th. So we have two of the best teams in the league, especially over the second half, facing off in a first round battle. A toss-up? Perhaps. This is the kind of series that could hinge on any unimagined factor, but I'll go with a hunch that youth will prevail in this series. Pittsburgh in 7.

23 February 2007

Saturday Night just might be alright for fighting

UPDATE: Chris Drury, Maxim Afinogenov, Ales Kotalik, Jiri Novotny, Jaroslav Spacek, Paul Gaustad, Dan Paille. All out for undetermined lengths (Gaustad until next season). Buffalo's record in their last 10: 8-1-1.


Buffalo feed:


Canadian (SportsNet) feed:


this freakin' kills me:


just a few quotes:

Lindy Ruff: "...go out and run 'em"

"If they want to start something, we've got guys that can handle that and it should be a good one Saturday," [Dany] Heatley said. "It's fun to play them.

"They're exciting, emotional games. We've got some guys that we don't like over there. And I'm sure they don't like a lot of our guys over here."

Old time hockey.

Rematch at 7pm in Ottawa tomorrow night. CBC. RDS. MSG.

28 September 2006

Northeast Division Preview

(as published in the 2006-2007 SportsBlurb.com Hockey Sourcebook)

NORTHEAST DIVISION

Last season the Northeast division started as a runaway and ended with a surprisingly close finish - Ottawa got off to a ridiculous start to the season but injuries began to slow them and the surprising Buffalo Sabres nearly caught them by season’s end. The Montreal Canadiens, buoyed by an unexpected goaltender, caught fire in the second half to reach the playoffs and put a scare into the eventual Cup champs. Toronto and Boston came into the season with high hopes but by April were left scrambling to answer many questions about their poor finishes. In this division filled with historically hockey-crazy markets the pressure is always on each of these teams to ice a contending team, and all have high hopes again for this year with at least two of them with serious Stanley Cup dreams.

Predicted order of finish by staff:

Ottawa Senators *

Buffalo Sabres *

Montreal Canadiens

Boston Bruins

Toronto Maple Leafs

BUFFALO SABRES

2005-06 record: 52-24-6, 110 points. 2nd in division/4th in conference. Lost in conference semi-final to Carolina.

Head coach: Lindy Ruff

General Manager: Darcy Regier

Home arena: HSBC Arena

Capacity: 18690

Buffalo emerged from five years of hell to become one of last season’s great stories – after having missed the playoffs each years since 2001 and going through bankruptcy, ownership change, and possible loss of franchise, the Sabres made it to the conference finals last season only to run out of steam in the final 20 minutes of game seven. To many the Buffalo Sabres emerged from nowhere to win a franchise record 52 games but closer inspection would have revealed a team that was poised for success by the end of the 2004 season.

Darcy Regier and Lindy Ruff were often criticized over the past few years and took the brunt of the heat for the team’s failings; fielding accusations from lack of organizational direction to simply producing boring teams. Yet their long-term plan came to fruition last year when they shed their reputation as a defensive-oriented team and scored 281 goals, good for fifth overall in the NHL, all with their highest point-producer only scoring 73 points (Maxim Afinogenov).

Buffalo’s success gave their front office troubles this past off-season as they had a league-high 10 players file for arbitration, and it was a real challenge to keep the squad together. General Manager Darcy Regier did a fine job in retaining all of his forwards by coming to agreements with most of his arbitration cases before their hearings. Daniel Briere was their first arbitration hearing and he was awarded $5 million, which threatened to throw the Sabres’ entire salary structure out of whack. Doubtless prompted by Briere's shocking award, Regier changed his long-held philosophy and began giving long term deals, insuring Buffalo’s core of remaining together for the next few years. They just completed signing arguably their key player, goaltender Ryan Miller, to complete a highly impressive job by Regier in keeping this team together. The two notable exceptions were Jay McKee (signed a four-year deal with St. Louis) and J.P. Dumont, who was awarded $2.9 million by an arbiter, but due to the Sabres’ rapidly escalating payroll they chose to walk away from the award. Dumont later signed with Nashville.

Forwards:

Buffalo offered up an offensive blueprint for the new NHL by rolling out four talented lines all season, none of which could really be considered their “top” line – this made it virtually impossible for opposing coaches to match up a checking line against the Sabres. If the Daniel Briere/Jochen Hecht/Dumont line was being marked, they’d have the Derek Roy/Maxim Afinogenov/Thomas Vanek line to contend with, along with other talented snipers like Jason Pominville, Ales Kotalik, and Chris Drury - who scored 30 goals for the first time in his career. Tim Connolly reversed years of disappointment to have by far his best season in the NHL, with 55 points in 63 games, and was utterly dominant at times. His serious concussion, suffered in the playoffs against Ottawa, is a concern as Connolly has a history of head injuries, and official word was slow in coming as to his status during the spring. Buffalo re-signed him to a three year deal this summer which indicated some confidence in his ability to bounce back, but as of early September he is not expected to attend training camp. If he is lost for any time, look for Jiri Novotny to be the first callup; Novotny saw limited action last year until the playoffs when he took a regular shift in place of Connolly. Paul Gaustad was a valuable rookie center on the fourth line last year, playing excellent two-way hockey. He’ll chip in the occasional goal but his main contribution this year will be to provide some unique toughness on a squad otherwise built on speed and finesse. Physical winger Adam Mair will also be expected to take on a greater role, with the losses of Mike Grier and Taylor Pyatt to free agency.

In the end, this year’s offence should look much the same as last year, with Briere being the offensive catalyst. He played to a 100-point pace last year (missing 34 games due to abdominal injury) and should approach that total this year. Candidates to replace Dumont on the top line would be team leading scorer Afinogenov, Thomas Vanek, or second year speedy winger Pominville, who excelled after a December callup and cemented his place on the team. Other candidates to make the big club this year on a regular basis would be Dan Paille and Drew Stafford – former star at the University of North Dakota.

A lot can be said about the depth of the Sabres’ offence in that the rookie left winger Vanek – a 25 goal scorer during the regular season – was benched during much of the postseason. He has 50 goal talent with a lethal shot and creative scoring mind, but at times needs a road map to the Buffalo side of the ice. With continued coaching and hard work, he has the greatest potential to dramatically increase his scoring totals this year.

Defence:

On paper, this is a defence without a lot of big names, but – as with the offence – the sum may be greater than its parts. Buffalo will miss longtime veteran Jay McKee who signed as a free agent with the Blues. The shot blocker extraordinaire - who would have been a fool to turn down St. Louis’ overwhelming offer of $16 million for the next four years was replaced on the open market by Jaroslav Spacek, inked for the next three years. Spacek is a different sort of defenceman, who fits more in line with the Sabres’ aggressive offensive philosophy. Anything that might be lost on the defensive end will hopefully be made up on the offensive side of the scoresheet – expect Spacek and young Brian Campbell to anchor the top power play unit. Veterans Henrik Tallinder and Toni Lydman will be expected to absorb the bulk of the play against opponents’ top forwards, while ageless Teppo Numminen returns for one last shot at the Cup. Dmitri Kalinin, a disappointment for years, had an excellent playoff run before succumbing to injury. Depth at the position would be filled by rookie Nathan Paetsch (a near guarantee to slide into the lineup next season after Numminen finally retires). The Sabres are also very high on Owen Sound (OHL) defenceman Andrej Sekera who is likely a few years away.

Goaltending:

Historically this has nearly always been one of Buffalo’s greatest strengths. From Roger Crozier to Don Edwards/Bob Sauve; Tom Barrasso to the legendary Dominik Hasek – there has been no shortage of excellent goaltending for the Sabres. Last year marked the official rookie season of arguably the most successful collegiate goaltender ever – Ryan Miller – who was dominant at Michigan State at the turn of the decade. Miller was solid all year and helped steal games on the rare night where the offense couldn’t dominate. Martin Biron, relegated to a backup role for the first time in a few years, ironically likely drove his market value to an all-time high with a 13-game winning streak over the winter while Miller was on the shelf with a broken thumb. Miller is clearly the goalie for the future, and even though having Biron is a great luxury, it’s a $2.1 million luxury. Don’t be surprised if Biron is dealt away at some point as the Sabres are right up at the cap maximum. Adam Dennis provides support and would be the backup in the event of a deal; Dennis split a highly successful junior career between Guelph and London, winning a Memorial Cup in 2005 with the Knights.

Summary:

Lindy Ruff is the longest-tenured coach in the NHL, having been with Buffalo since 1997. He has earned the respect of his players and is a favourite of the local media, as he is both engaging and not shy about wearing his emotions on his sleeve. The Sabres’ franchise is back on strong ground after the roughest stretch of their history, and appears poised to recapture the popularity of their legendary 70s teams – they recently had to cap season ticket sales to allow a small amount of single game tickets. Cup fever runs high in the Queen City and therein lies a big difference between last year and this: last year’s success was perhaps the most entertaining season in 36 years of Sabres’ hockey. This year – rightly or wrongly - anything less than an appearance in the Cup final will be viewed as a disappointment. The team won’t sneak up on anyone this season, but probably won’t have to – they have the deepest offense in the league, one of the top young goaltenders in the world, and a solid and deep (if unspectacular) defensive corps. With the core of their team still very young, it’s not a stretch to expect them to actually improve by the end of this season. Barring their freakish run of injuries in last year’s playoffs they very likely could have won the Cup this past June – a goal that seems very much within reach this year.

OTTAWA SENATORS

2005-06 record: 52-21-9, 113 points. 1st in division/1st in conference. Lost in conference semi-finals to Buffalo.

Head coach: Bryan Murray

General Manager: John Muckler

Home arena: Scotiabank Place

Capacity: 19153

After another wildly successful regular season – finishing first in the East and holding that spot virtually all season – the Ottawa Senators once again failed to live up to lofty expectations, bowing out to the Buffalo Sabres in the second round in only five games. In their defence, that was one of the tightest five-game series in recent memory, with three games going to overtime. Still, at this point nothing less than a Cup finals appearance will appease Sens fans, who run the risk of seeing the Senators soon being labeled as one of the all-time underachieving teams. Often when a team goes through what Ottawa has there is much finger-pointing and an urge to make radical changes.

Ottawa has made no less than three significant changes to this point, starting with the loss of Zdeno Chara to Boston. Suffice to say the Sens will be poorer on defence without him this year, even if his loss was inevitable (and in the long run likely beneficial in a financial sense). One interesting side-story to losing Chara was the loss of assistant GM Peter Chiarelli, also to Boston. It was very curious that Chiarelli signed on with Boston before his official duties with the Senators were completed; both sides made attempts to insure that Chiarelli could do no business during the free-agent period but one would have to assume that he played at least some small role in Boston getting Chara. Chiarelli was summarily dismissed from his last days in Ottawa soon after the loss of big Z.

Speedy winger Martin Havlat seemed to be as good as gone, having postured through the media that he’d be seeking a rich contract when he became an unrestricted free agent after next season. So it was hardly a surprise when he was dealt, along with Brian Smolinski in a three way deal with Chicago and San Jose that netted defenceman Tom Priessing and young talent in defenceman Michal Barinka and center Josh Hennessy - two players that could play important roles for the Sens within a few years.

Finally, the team severed ties with Dominik Hasek after a long drawn-out “will he or won’t he come back?” affair after suffering a serious groin injury last year during the Olympics.

Forwards:

Despite the loss of Havlat, there probably isn’t a team in the world that can boast a top threesome of Jason Spezza, Dany Heatley, and Daniel Alfredsson. Before injuries, Spezza was a strong contender for the Art Ross trophy while Alfredsson was an early Hart trophy front-runner. Dany Heatley managed 50 goals and could easily match that this year in another bid for the Richard trophy. Havlat’s departure may appear to thin out the offensive ranks a bit, but make no mistake – this team is very deep (also remember that Havlat only played 18 games last season). The captain Alfredsson was the victim of some harsh criticism following the playoff loss to Buffalo (accentuated by him getting torched on a shorthanded series-winning overtime goal by Jason Pominville), but management wisely looked at the overall picture and retained the highly talented winger. It’s likely the top three will remain split up among the top two lines, with second year winger Patrick Eaves a good candidate to take a spot alongside Spezza and Heatley. If this is the case, Eaves could see a huge jump in his point totals, with 30 goals and 70 points not out of the question. Peter Schaefer and center Mike Fisher, while not as electric as their all-star teammates, are outstanding all around forwards who have 60 point capability. Chris Neil may often play the part of team goon, but his 16 goals prove that he’s more Tiger Williams than Dave Brown. Filling out the center positions are Antoine Vermette, who chipped in 21 goals while getting virtually no power play time, and Chris Kelly who added 30 points and was a +21 playing the defensive forward role. Veteran Dean McAmmond was also signed from St. Louis and will provide two-way support.

Defence:

The obvious top story here is the loss of giant defenseman Zdeno Chara. The 6’7” Slovakian left for Boston, but what remains should still be a strong corps. Wade Redden was and is their best all-around defenseman – he was re-signed for two years and will likely take on more responsibilities this year. Chris Phillips and Anton Volchenkov return as the defensive stalwarts – these two will be saddled with the task of handling much of the opposition’s best (although it’s hard to shake the image of Volchenkov coughing up the puck against Buffalo last year in one of the all-time wild playoff games won by the Sabres 7-6). Newcomers include Tom Preissing and Joe Corvo - two very promising offensive additions acquired from the Sharks and Kings respectively. They both should see ample time on the power play, and in turn second year pro Andrej Meszaros hopes to build upon his outstanding rookie season, compiling 39 points and a +34 rating. I wouldn’t expect his point total to be any higher mostly due to the two new additions who will likely steal most of Meszaros’ special teams opportunities.

Goaltending:

Ray Emery was made into a bit of a scapegoat last season and in the playoffs. While he did give up a few high-profile soft goals in the postseason, he was not the reason Ottawa went home early - after game one of the Sabres series the high-profile forwards of the Senators scored no more goals at five-on-five. Regardless, it seems that the Senators front office are also lacking faith in Emery as their new number one goalie, so this summer Ottawa came to terms with former Carolina goalie Martin Gerber, who had a fine season with the Cup champs. Gerber owned the starting job for most of the year before losing the starting job to Cam Ward for most of the playoffs. Gerber signed a three-year deal with the Senators.

Summary:

It’s very possible that this is the “last chance” for this version of the Senator franchise, however you choose to define the phrase. Here is another team that the fanbase is counting on for a run to the finals, but the difference here may be a major rebuilding in Ottawa if they again underachieve. Again, the perception is that this is one of the most underachieving franchises in recent history and last year’s dominant regular season followed by a relatively quick playoff exit did nothing to disprove this. Yet to the credit of the front office, radical changes were not made as they should realize that for a few bounces that could have gone their way in the series loss to Buffalo, they could have advanced to face Carolina in the conference finals. Often times the degree of chance is dismissed in all sports, and hockey especially, and only a small amount of luck could have been the difference between a second round exit and the Stanley Cup. The franchise is mostly content to give this core one last try to advance to the finals, and they should be viewed as one of the top handful of teams to be able to contend this year.

BOSTON BRUINS

2005-06 record: 29-37-16, 74 points. 5th in division/13th in conference. Missed playoffs.

Head coach: Dave Lewis

General Manager: Peter Chiarelli

Home arena: TD BankNorth Garden

Capacity: 17565

Wow, for a franchise that has been alienating fans and media for the better part of the past decade, the Bruins generated quick headlines early in the summer by making three major on-ice moves and initiating a front office shakeup. Finally loosening their grip on Bobby Orr, ageless Harry Sinden stepped down from the Bruins’ front office after over 30 years running the Boston Bruins’ ship in various capacities, from head coach in the Orr/Phil Esposito days, to becoming General Manager and presiding over various incarnations of the black and gold; the Don Cherry-led Big Bad Bruins of the late 70s through the talented squads led by Ray Bourque and Cam Neely in the 80s and early 90s. Not having Harry Sinden around anymore may be less of an organizational impact as it would have been a few years back, but the symbolic nature of the move is huge. Generations of hockey fans in New England know of no other man leading the team, and this now represents a new era. Previous to this long-rumoured yet still surprising move the Bruins began their house-cleaning in early summer by firing head coach Mike Sullivan, and replacing him with former Detroit coach Dave Lewis. They hired a new young General Manager - Peter Chiarelli - away from the Ottawa Senators, which cleared the path for Sinden to formally step aside.

With the new management team beginning to take shape, they wasted little time in popping the cork on the first day of free agency by signing towering defenceman Zdeno Chara to an equally-towering contract for USD$7.5 million per year for five years. There are two ways to view this – from a roster perspective and from a long-term financial perspective. There’s no way to look at this and think this doesn’t help the Bruins on-ice situation tremendously – Chara is a beast and has developed into one of the premier defencemen in the world. Yet there’s also reason to believe that this contract may cripple the Bruins for years, as they’ve committed a huge percentage of payroll to one player. Joe Thornton’s exit out of town last year was in part due to his huge contract; by dealing him for cheaper parts they were better poised to mold the rest of the team, and yet theoretically they’re in the same spot now, just with a different player. In the end this signing will likely be judged not on Chara’s performance but on the young (read: less expensive) players the Bruins will have to eventually surround him with.

Boston also swapped defencemen with Phoenix, giving up Nick Boynton and gaining hometown native Paul Mara. This deal should prove beneficial to Boston; with Nick Boynton last year the Bruins had a defenceman who could not adapt to the faster league. Mara brings a more creative and talented game to Boston and coupled with the strong defensive play of Chara these additions should improve the Bruin defence tremendously, one that played poorly last year, giving up over 32 shots per game - sixth-worst in the league.

The third major move was signing free agent center Marc Savard to a four year deal. Savard has always been a talented center who finally broke through last year with a huge season, notching 97 points for the Atlanta Thrashers. Cynics will point out that he’ll no longer have Ilya Kovalchuk to dish the puck to in Boston so anything south of say 80 points could bring the heat to Savard and the Bruins, especially since the Bruins have committed $20 million to him over the next four years. Nevertheless the addition of Savard gives Boston more balance to their offence, enabling them to hopefully spread more goals between lines.

Forwards:

There has been such a string of negativity in Boston towards the Bruins in recent years, and last year’s trade of Joe Thornton to San Jose – followed by his subsequent Art Ross and Hart trophy awards – only made it worse. The perception of the penurious nature of the combination of Harry Sinden and owner Jeremy Jacobs was first presented over a decade ago in the local press and has gathered steam exponentially over the years to the point where it is the knee-jerk analytical reaction to nearly every move or failure by the Bruin organization. It really helps to focus on each move individually to see – while there may be some strains of truth to this argument – many times the answer is not that simple. For example, in the deal for Thornton, the Bruins received three players, including winger Marco Sturm (along with center Wayne Primeau and defenceman Brad Stuart). The Bruins – and Joe Thornton himself – were wallowing along in mediocrity and this deal helped to signal to the players – and fanbase – that the status quo was not acceptable. On the ice, it created more roster flexibility – Sturm joined Patrice Bergeron and Brad Boyes (who came over from San Jose in a fantastic trade two years ago) for a first line that I anticipate will be that much better this year. The Bruins inked the 21-year old Bergeron to a long-term deal (five years) this summer, anticipating him leading the Bruins offence through the end of the decade. Bergeron is a flashy and fun player, and should be their best forward for the length of the contract. Boyes enjoyed an outstanding rookie season, notching 26 goals and 69 points – he should build upon that this year and reach those totals again. Last summer if you had told Boston fans that they’d be adding Phil Kessel to the team in one year they would have been thrilled – Kessel was pegged as the top pick in the 2006 draft until perception of a down season at the University of Minnesota and a widespread belief that he was lackluster at the World Junior tournament in Vancouver (despite leading the tournament in points) hurt his reputation. As a result he slid all the way to fifth in the draft where the Bruins were eager to snatch him up. Kessel could still end up being the most talented player to come out of this draft and at his peak could be a 40-goal scorer for the Bruins in the near future – in August he was enticed to forego the remainder of his collegiate career and signed a three-year deal with Boston. If he plays with Savard and winger Glen Murray – who occasionally looked helpless without Thornton as his center, this could be the makings of a dynamic and fun second scoring line in Boston, and if he plays with the top duo, 30 goals is not far off. Depth may be a problem, as the only reliable forward beyond the top lines is winger P.J. Axelsson, one of the better defensive forwards in the NHL. Wayne Primeau never has really shown the ability that made him a first round pick back in 1994 (although he did score one of last year’s highlight-reel goals). Anything that he can give on a third or fourth line will be welcome. Other wingers that will be vying for time are veteran Shean Donovan and wingers Petr Tenkrat and Yan Stastny. Mike Mowers should be the team’s fourth center.

Defence:

The acquisition of Chara gives Boston a clear number one defenseman for the first time in years. Chara will play minutes in all situations, and with Brad Stuart (picked number three overall in the 1998 draft) as their number two immediately should give Bruin goaltenders confidence. Stuart is an outstanding understated defenceman who should be in his prime, and don’t discount the fact that this is his contract year. The two may be split up with Chara playing with second year defenceman Milan Jurcina – Jurcina has good upside and would benefit from playing with Chara - he didn't put up a lot of points last year but expect his offensive contributions to increase as his comfort level grows. Paul Mara brings a talented offensive flair to the Boston defence - he scored 47 points, 29 of which were on the powerplay. Much the same as their offense, Boston may have a problem with depth with Mark Stuart, Andrew Alberts, Nathan Dempsey and Jason York and vying for the fifth and sixth spots. David Tanabe was awarded $1.275 million in arbitration and the Bruins walked away from the award, enabling him to become an unrestricted free agent. This was a bit surprising - Tanabe was a mid-first round pick as recently as 1999 but with the Boston’s numerous additions this off-season he was deemed expendable.

Goaltending:

Goaltending should be fine if not spectacular this season with veteran Tim Thomas and young Hannu Toivonen sharing duties. Thomas was a career (minor leaguer/backup) who by circumstance took on the top spot in the Bruins’ crease last January, and excelled, which ended up making former number one goalie Andrew Raycroft expendable. A summer deal with Toronto gave up Raycroft who seemed to have lost his way in Boston – this could pan out very well for Boston in the future as they gained highly-regarded prospect Tuukka Rask who should project to be the Bruins’ starting goalie in about three to four years.

Summary:

On the negative side, the Chara and Savard signings could haunt them. In the salary cap era committing that much money to one player is potentially crippling. The Bruins’ front office will have to be creative and proactive in shaping their roster, filling out the remaining holes with talented “no-name” (read: inexpensive) players if they plan on competing, rather than becoming a top-heavy team – a few marquee names may carry you through the regular season, but the NHL chews up unbalanced teams come playoff time (see Philadelphia Flyers).

New England hockey fans will love the young forwards Boyes and Bergeron leading them over the next few years, and if Phil Kessel keeps his focus and can contribute the way Boston hopes there is potential for a lot of fun for Bruins fans this year. They should again be on the bubble of making the playoffs and if everything goes right they could find themselves playing meaningful hockey come mid-April. This team doesn’t appear ready to join the upper echelon of the league – or even the division – yet, as Ottawa and Buffalo show no signs of coming back to the pack, and depth for the Bruins is a problem this year. Yet Boston’s time is coming closer – this is a team that in two or three years could be a power and could be a sleeper team this year.

MONTREAL CANADIENS

2005-06 record: 42-31-9, 93 points. 3rd in division/7th in conference. Lost in first round to Carolina.

Head coach: Guy Carbonneau

General Manager: Bob Gainey

Home arena: Bell Centre

Capacity: 21273

After a slow start last season, the Canadiens began the long slow climb to playoff contention, qualifying for the postseason despite being outscored on the season, 243-247. Probably the single-biggest story for the Habs last year was their goaltending – but of course the name was hardly the one that would have been expected. Former Hart Trophy winner Jose Theodore suffered through a nightmare of a year, from off-ice accusations of gambling and steroid involvement, to injuries and a dramatic dropoff in his overall play. Instead French-born goaltender Cristobal Huet took over top netminding duties in the winter and was so good during the second half in nearly singlehandedly bringing the Habs to the playoffs that he should have received Vezina consideration, even having played in only 36 games. Montreal seemed on their way to upsetting the second-seeded Carolina Hurricanes after two games, scoring 12 goals en route to winning both games in Carolina. In game three the Hurricanes switched goalies, introducing Cam Ward as the Hurricanes’ starter and the Canadiens lost Saku Koivu to a serious eye injury (which nearly ended his career). Carolina rattled off four straight wins to end Montreal’s season.

Offence:

The biggest news for the Habs this summer was the free agent signing of the enigmatic Sergei Samsonov. He’ll be counted on for big things in Montreal, although it pays to bear in mind that only twice in eight NHL seasons has Sammy even hit 70 points, with 75 being a high back in 2001 (he also notched a career high in goals that season with 29). It’s time that Samsonov ultimately be filed in the “he is what he is” category – he’ll always dazzle, but he’s not a superstar 100-point type player, as many pundits and fans expect him to be. Still, this is a valuable offensive addition to a team that finished 20th out of 30 in scoring last season. The Canadiens could form a very potent top power play with Samsonov playing alongside captain Saku Koivu and Alexei Kovalev. Often Koivu centered Michael Ryder and 23 goal rookie Christopher Higgins. If Mike Ribeiro centers Samsonov and Kovalev, look for a good statistical season from him, in the range of 60-70 points. Montreal shouldn’t expect much point production beyond the top two lines, with centers Tomas Plekanec and Radek Bonk and aggressive wingers Garth Murray and Steve Begin. Begin is a popular player in Montreal, with his breakneck style of play. The energy he brings is a good contrast to the general lack of physical play for the top forwards on the team. Mike Johnson tallied 54 points which is probably his peak at this point in his career.

Defence:

The Montreal defence won’t be compared with the legendary Larry Robinson/Serge Savard/Guy Lapointe defence. Andrei Markov is ever-improving, and led the defence with 46 points last year while earning a +13. He and Sheldon Souray should anchor the blueline for the first power play unit and could both approach the 50 point barrier. Beyond that the Habs need improvement. Mike Komisarek probably shows the most promise of any Montreal defenceman – he’ll never be a point-scorer but if he develops into a reliable defensive stalwart it will be a bonus for Montreal. Craig Rivet and Francis Bouillon are average defencemen called on to play a major role for the Canadiens, while veteran Mathieu Dandenault will likely round out the top six. Depth will be provided by Mark Streit. Rookie Jean-Philippe Cote, a stay at home defenceman, will hope to stick with the squad this year after playing eight games on Montreal last year.


Goaltending:

The other major Canadiens’ signing this summer was the re-signing of goaltender Cristobal Huet to a two-year deal. Enough was written about Huet last year as he went from relative unknown to hero in Quebec, taking over from the fallen Jose Theodore and becoming the number one man in net. How long that will remain is uncertain, and all eyes will be on Huet to match his stellar second-half performance for the entire season. The Habs also inked David Aebischer for one season, solidifying the position as a backup to Huet. David Aebischer is three years younger and likely has a higher ceiling than Huet – if the Canadiens slip this year they could start having Aebischer share number one duties with Huet and create a competition.

Summary:

Huet opens up this season as the number one goalie for the first time in his career. Not many have questioned the talent of David Aebischer in case Huet falters, but there are concerns as to whether each can carry a team for an entire season. The outlook for the Canadiens this year is uncertain – this appears to be a decent-at-best team, one that will be able to compete most nights with any team, but lacking the overall depth and star power to reel off enough winning streaks to put distance between them and the rest of the league. In the end, it remains to be seen whether what they currently have will be enough to make the playoffs as this team will probably be as good as it was last year – the only problem is that a number of teams just behind them appear to have improved. That may be enough to keep the Canadiens on the outside looking in come April.

TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

2005-06 record: 41-33-8, 90 points. 4th in division/9th in conference. Missed playoffs.

Head coach: Paul Maurice

General Manager: John Ferguson, Jr.

Home arena: Air Canada Centre

Capacity: 18819

As fans of the five other Canadian NHL franchises like to remind their TO brethren – it has now been 39 years and counting since the Leafs last raised the Cup. Changes were needed and the most noticeable will be behind the bench as Pat Quinn was shown the door and replaced by former Hartford/Carolina head coach Paul Maurice. It seemed clear that a new vision was needed by the end of last year, and some big name veterans were jettisoned in the post-season housecleaning. The Eric Lindros experiment is wisely over – his name is clearly greater than his current skill level, and he now moves on to Dallas. Other vets who won’t be back are Jason Allison, Luke Richardson and Aki Berg.

The Paul Maurice era hopefully begins a long-overdue movement towards focusing on drafting and developing players from within their farm system. Yet General Manager John Ferguson, Jr. remains and he ultimately has been the somewhat failed architect of the Toronto club. His stamp on the team still remains as he did enter the free agent market, signing a few veterans this summer. Ferguson will be next on the chopping block if the Leafs don’t take advantage of the remaining years in Mats Sundin’s career and show progress within the next year or two.

Offence:

Underrated captain Mats Sundin begins his 11th season with the Leafs. Sundin has occasionally been the recipient of criticism that he saves his best games for international competition, but the obvious logic behind that criticism is that he has played with vastly superior talent in the Olympics/World Championships than he ever has on the Leafs. Furthermore, coach Pat Quinn’s creative lineup construction often left Sundin outside of the top three in ice time for forwards in crucial games, an almost inconceivable error of judgment as Sundin has virtually always been the best player on the Leafs. Sundin heads up a decent cast of centers with Toronto native and veteran Michael Peca being signed away from the Edmonton Oilers for one year at $2.5 million; the Leafs should hope they’ve signed the Peca from the most recent playoffs, not the one who looked lost for most of the regular season. He will likely play on the third line with second year man Kyle Wellwood looking to improve on a very solid rookie campaign. Wellwood was a prolific scorer in the OHL and may be a great key to the success of the Leafs. The wingers are question marks for Toronto with the most promising being Alex Steen, son of former Winnipeg Jet Thomas Steen. Steen scored 45 points last year – he’s likely still about two years away from peaking but should reach the 50 point mark this year. Agitator Darcy Tucker – probably outside of Toronto the least-favourite player in the league this side of Sean Avery – had a career year last year with 28 goals, but he’ll need to improve his even-strength play to be able to duplicate that effort. Alexei Ponikarovsky not only chipped in 21 goals but was a +15 on a team that gave up 270 goals while only scoring 257. 19 of his goals were at even strength or short-handed – both were tops on the team. He’s probably the most unknown talent on the team. Wrapping up the scoring lines is Nik Antropov – the longtime enigma; watching him play at the right time, you’d swear he’d score more than the 12 goals (in 57 games) he did. At this point Antropov is not likely to produce much more than he had, and if he gets 20 goals or 50 points the Leafs should be thrilled. Peca’s third line wingers will most likely be veterans Jeff O’Neill and Chad Kilger, three players who have all but surely peaked in their careers. Peca especially hopes to rebound – despite an outstanding playoff run he had arguably the worst regular season of his career. The fourth line will likely be centered by Matt Stajan with any number of rookies looking to make the squad on wing, such as Aleksander Suglobov or Ben Ondrus.

Defence:

The Leafs’ defence was led last year by fantastic seasons from Bryan McCabe and Tomas Kaberle, scoring 68 and 67 points respectively. McCabe was resigned for two more years this offseason, insuring at least the Leafs’ top power play unit will be a constant threat. To bolster the losses of Luke Richardson and Aki Berg they dipped into the free agent market and signed Pavel Kubina from Tampa and Hal Gill from Boston. Kubina has very good offensive skills but the $5 million per year contract he was given is questionable – the Leafs have a need for defensive defenceman and Kubina doesn’t exactly fill that need. Hal Gill looks like a bad signing, as his skills have deteriorated. He’ll never get more than a handful of points and his slow skating could cause nightmares for Toronto goalies. Aside from veteran tough guy Wade Belak, the back end of the Toronto defence is highly inexperienced, with Carlo Colaiacovo, Staffan Kronwall and Ian White all battling for the final two spots; that final defensive pairing is likely to be in flux for months – in terms of fantasy spots, aside from the top three slots there’s no potential here outside of Colaiacovo who is likely still a few years away from getting enough ice time to produce consistently.

Goaltending:

Likely the most noticeable problem for the Leafs last year was goaltending, with Billion-Dollar Eddie Belfour finally showing his age in having a poor season and the team’s lack of faith in backup Mikael Tellqvist. A trade with the Boston Bruins gained them their new number one goalie, former rookie of the year Andrew Raycroft, as they effectively severed ties with Belfour. This move at worst shouldn’t backfire on the Leafs this year - they immediately gain an experienced, successful, yet young goaltender. But if Raycroft can’t regain his Calder trophy form they’ll be forced to turn to Tellqvist and a host of minor league goaltenders. J.S. Aubin saw limited action last year but was undefeated in 11 games. The future at this point is in the hands of Justin Pogge, who was declared Canadian Junior Goaltender of the Year with the Calgary Hitmen (WHL) last season.

Summary:

The Maple Leafs are not a bad team, but a team in transition. There’s a dichotomy of talent here – a number of veterans at or near the tail end of their career coupled with a number of first and second year players. Logically this would indicate a necessity to win in the immediate future, capitalizing on the time left for the veterans. However, it’s not going out on a limb to say that the Leafs aren’t going to win the Cup this year, despite some talent. Toronto also has a lot of money tied up in a few players – Mats Sundin and newly-resigned defenceman Bryan McCabe will make nearly $15 million between the two of them. Combine that with the $5 million they’re giving to Pavel Kubina and you have nearly half the cap room tied up in just three players. In the end, there’s just not enough for the Leafs to compete in this very challenging division, and another year will go by where fans in Toronto have to visit the Hall of Fame to see the Cup rather than have it paraded down Yonge Street.